Non-Compliant US Taxpayers Take Note!

IRS Grants Significant Penalty Relief and Extensions Under the 2011 OVDI in Certain Circumstances

On June 2, 2011 the IRS updated the 2011 OVDI frequently asked questions webpage. FAQ 25, 51, and 52 were modified to allow an extension past the August 31, 2011 deadline and a significant reduction in penalties if certain elements are satisfied. The following is an overview of the modifications to the 2011 OVDI:

1.      FAQ 25.1 allows a taxpayer to request an extension to complete his or her submission if the taxpayer can demonstrate a good faith attempt to comply with the August 31, 2011 deadline. Requests for the 90 day extension must include a statement of missing items, the reasons why they are missing, and the steps taken to secure them. 
 

2.      FAQ 52 now provides for significant offshore penalty relief for taxpayers who have resided in a foreign country (such as Canada),  have been compliant with the tax laws in that foreign country, and have US source income of $10,000 or less per year. For these taxpayers, the 25% penalty (of the highest aggregate balance in foreign bank accounts/entities) shall not apply and will be eligible for the reduced 5% penalty. In addition, for these taxpayers only, the offshore penalty will not apply to non-financial assets, such as real property, business interests, or artworks, purchased with funds for which the taxpayer can establish that all applicable taxes have been paid, either in the US or the country of residence. This exception applies if the income tax returns filed in the foreign country included the offshore-related taxable income that was not reported on the US tax return. 
 

3.      FAQ 51.1 provides examples where a taxpayer might consider opting out of the civil settlement structure of the 2011 OVDI. These examples include (1) unreported income but no tax deficiency, (2) unreported income and failure to file FBAR, and (3) unreported controlled foreign corporation. If the taxpayer opts out, penalties are significantly reduced and if reasonable cause can be proven then there is a possibility of no FBAR penalty.  

4.      Lastly, the IRS is accepting statements from taxpayers who participated in the 2009 OVDP and whose cases have been resolved and closed with a Form 906 closing agreement who believe the facts of their case qualify them for the 5% reduced penalty. Upon receipt, the case will be re-examined and a determination will be made.  

The new provisions in the FAQs are a welcome relief to both taxpayers and practitioners. As stated in our May 27, 2011 blog, the previous penalty structure was extremely punitive for the non-willful US taxpayer. US citizens living abroad who have been non-compliant need to act quickly and take advantage of the new penalty structure. To reiterate the words of Commissioner Shulman, “As we continue to amass more information and pursue more people internationally, the risk to individuals hiding assets offshore is increasing. This new effort gives those hiding money in foreign accounts a tough, fair way to resolve their tax problems once and for all. And it gives people a chance to come in before we find them. The risk of being caught will only increase.” 

Accordingly, US citizens resident in Canada should strongly consider this new program.

HSBC Client Prosecuted After "Quiet Disclosure"

On May 19, 2011 the Department of Justice released a statement regarding United States v. Michael F. Schiavo, a case where the defendant quietly disclosed a HSBC Bermuda account. The defendant, Michael Schiavo, was a Boston venture capitalist and director at Boston Private Bank and Trust Company. From 2003 to 2008, Mr. Schiavo failed to report his HSBC Bermuda account and $99,273 of income from a partnership that invested in medical devices. As a result, Mr. Schiavo deprived the IRS of $40,624 in taxes. 

As stated in our March 2011 blog, each US person who has a financial interest in or signature or other authority over any foreign financial accounts, including bank, securities, or other types of financial accounts, in a foreign country, if the aggregate value of these financial accounts exceeds $10,000 at any time during the calendar year, must report that relationship each calendar year by filing a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (Form TD F 90-22.1 (FBAR)). 

On October 6, 2009, Mr. Schiavo made a “quiet disclosure” to report his HSBC Bermuda account. A quiet disclosure occurs when a taxpayer amends or files previous returns and pays related taxes and penalties without notifying the IRS through the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative or the Internal Revenue Manual Voluntary Disclosure. However, Mr. Schiavo made a partial disclosure and failed to report his income from his partnership on his 2006 return. After a visit from an IRS agent on October 27, 2009, Mr. Schiavo amended his 2006 return to report the undisclosed income. 

According to the criminal information and plea agreement, Mr. Schiavo faces up to five years in prison, followed by three years of supervised release and a $250,000 fine. In addition, Mr. Schiavo agreed to pay a civil money penalty of $76,283, half the value of the highest balance of the HSBC Bermuda account for failing to file an FBAR. 

The End of Quiet Disclosures? 

Under the current Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative Q&A, the IRS does not recommend taxpayers make quiet disclosures and are strongly encouraged to come forward under the OVDI. Taxpayers who make quiet disclosures run the risk of being examined and potentially criminally prosecuted for all applicable years. 

Many complaints that surround the 2011 OVDI is that the program is too punitive. In other words, the IRS is “trying to kill a mouse with an elephant gun.” Many people who are beginning to come forward are not willful tax evaders and are just learning about their US tax obligations. The Schiavo case adds another wrinkle, and taxpayers must be aware the risks of not entering the 2011 OVDI. However, it should be noted that Mr. Schiavo did not fully disclose the first time and this may be why the IRS gave Mr. Schiavo such a severe punishment.